On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference. A reporter asked, in his recent policy speech on China, Babaylan said that China posed the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the spokesperson’s comment on this?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of lies and inverted black and white. The basis for attacking China is precisely what the United States is doing today. The United States itself wears the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The so-called “rules-based international order” advocated by the United States is just an international order based on the rules of the United States, and it is a hegemonic order that dominates the world with “family laws and regulations”. My colleagues have responded to the content of his speech last week. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the US lies and fallacies and its hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the UN Charter and international law. The United States has been in power for more than 200 years and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest source of chaos and the biggest instability factor of international order in the current international peace and stability. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy: America’s Fatal Export”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interfered.30 less democratic elections. According to a report from Brown University in the United States, since 2001 alone, the United States has either launched wars or carried out military operations in the name of “counter-terrorism”, causing more than 800,000 deaths, including 300,000 civilians, and more than 20 million refugees have been generated by victimized countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria alone. Secondly, the United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order in Cinema. It has become common for the United States to stick to American centralism and American exceptionalism and break contracts and withdraw from the group at will. The United States not only rejects the signing or ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, votes against the Global Compact on Migration and the Global Compact on Refugees, but also exclusively blocks negotiations on the UN Protocol to the Verification of the Convention on Biological Weapons. Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from 17 international organizations or agreements including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization, UNESCO, the Paris Agreement, the Iran nuclear agreement, the Arms Trade Treaty, the China-Rail Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, and other 17 international organizations or agreements, including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization, the United Nations Educational and National Development Treaty. Such an American is so arrogant and disguised as a referee of international rules, using the so-called rules flashlight to shine on others, and ignoring the darkness of its own light. When US politicians are confidently speaking with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, they don’t know if they know that the United States is not even a party to the Convention.
Thirdly, the United States is not qualified to discuss rules at all. In the United States, international rules come from BabaylanKomiks from Cinema to serve American interests and hegemony. When the two are consistent, the United States uses rules as a basis, and when they are contrary to each other, it regards the rules as air. I would like to ask the US side to answer several questions: When the United States wants to launch an arbitrary mobilization of sovereign states KomiksWhen the war was launched, what were the rules? When the United States imposed illegal unilateral sanctions and trapped the people of relevant countries in trouble, what were the rules? When the United States continued to owe the United Nations $1 billion in membership dues and $1.4 billion in security contributions, what were the rules? When the United States continued to owe to the United Nations $1 billion in membership fees and $1.4 billion in security contributions, what were the rules? When the United States launched a trilateral security partnership and a four-party mechanism, attempting to build an Indo-Pacific version of NATO, it would disrupt the Asia-Pacific and undermine international nuclear power. When the Babaylan diffusion system is spreading, what are the rules? When the United States, under the banner of so-called democracy and conducts a division of the camp, excludes more than half of the world’s countries? When the WTO clearly confirms that the US tariff war against China violates global trade rules, but the United States does not implement it or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body to appoint a new judge, what are the rules?
CinemaFinally, the United States is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. The United States places domestic law above international law and international rules, and abuses illegal unilateral sanctions and long-term The Cinema arm has been under the jurisdiction of the new crown pneumonia epidemic. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria and Iran have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States. The domestic economic and medical conditions are harsh, and the epidemic situation is severe. Instead, the United States has not stopped sanctions, but has further increased its efforts, making these countries worse. The international community has become increasingly clear about the principles of market competition and international economic and trade that the United States claims will only be abide by when it is favorable to the United States. What American politicians say is href=”https://comicmov.com/”>CinemaFair competition and free trade, believe in the United States first, and the American stick is waving in his hands.
Zhao Lijian emphasized that in the past 70 years since the founding of New China, we have not taken the initiative to launch a war or occupied an inch of other countries. We insist on resolving disputes through dialogue and negotiation, and have been peacefully with 12 of the 14 land neighborsCompletely solve the problem of land borders. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest assessed country in the United Nations’ contributions and peacekeeping funds, actively participates in the construction and reform of the global governance system, and maintains the spirit of the UN Charter and the authority of the UN with practical actions. Facts have proved and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of international order. China will also always work with all peace-loving and justice-oriented countries to unite under the banner of the United Nations, practice true multilateralism, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.