On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference. A reporter asked, in a recent speech on China policy toward China, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order of Komiks. The United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the comment of the Babaylan spokesperson?
Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of lies and inverted black and white, and the basis for attacking China is exactly what the United States does today. The United States itself wears the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The so-called “rules-based international order” advocated by the United States is to put it bluntly, it is an international order based on American rules, and it is a hegemonic order that dominates the world with “home laws and regulations”. My colleagues have responded to the content of his speech last week. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the lies and fallacies of the US side and its hypocrisy.
First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the UN Charter and international law. The United States has been in power for more than 200 years and has not fought for only 16 years. It has become the biggest factor in the current international peace and stability and the biggest instability of international order. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually saying one thing and doing another. As American writer William Bloom pointed out in his book “Democracy: America’s Fatal Export”, since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interfere in democratic elections in at least 30 countries. According to the United States KomiksCinema investigates the negotiations to the Protocol. Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from 17 international organizations or agreements including the United Nations Human Rights Council, WHO, UNESCO, Paris Agreement, Iran Nuclear Agreement, Arms Trade Treaty, Intermediate-February Treaty, Open Skies Treaty, and other 17 international organizations or agreements. There is still a situation in Komiks that “retreat and return, and return again and return. Such a United States is so arrogant that it disguises itself as a referee who is international rules. href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Cinema, use the so-called rule-based Komiks to shine on others, ignoring the darkness of their own lights. When US politicians were politicizing with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, they didn’t know whether they knew that the United States even had the States Parties to the Convention.None of them.
Thirdly, the United States is not qualified to discuss rules at all. In the United States’ view, international rules have always been subordinate to and serve American interests and hegemony. When the two are consistent, the United States uses rules as a basis, and when they are contrary to each other, it regards rules as air. I would like to ask the US side to answer several questions: When the United States launches wars against sovereign countries and launches a color revolution, what are the rules? When the United States imposes illegal unilateral sanctions and traps people in relevant countries in trouble, what are the rules? When the United States continues to arrears of US$1 billion in membership dues and US$1.4 billion in peacekeeping assessments, what are the rules? When the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and quadratic mechanisms, and attempts to build an Indo-Pacific version of NATO, disrupting the Asia-Pacific and undermining the international nuclear non-proliferation system, what are the rules? When the United States, under the banner of so-called democracy and conducts a so-called “democracy summit” that separates the camp, excludes most of the world’s countries, what are the rules? When the WTO clearly confirms that the US tariff war against China violates global trade rules, but the United States does not enforce it or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body to appoint a new judge, what is the rule?
Finally, the United States is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. The United States places domestic law above international law and international rules, and abuses illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria and Iran have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States, and their domestic economic conditions and medical conditions are harsh and the epidemic situation is severe. Instead of stopping sanctions, the United States has further increased its efforts, making these countries worse. The international community is increasingly seeing the principles of market competition and international economic and trade advocated by the United States, and will only be abide by the United States when it is favorable to the United States. What American politicians talk about is fair competition and free trade, they believe in the United States first, and they wave the American stick in their hands. Zhao Lijian stressed that in the more than 70 years since the founding of New China, we have not taken the initiative to launch a war or occupied an inch of land in other countries. We insist on resolving the Babaylan dispute through dialogue and negotiation, and have completely resolved the land border issue in a peaceful manner with 12 of the 14 land neighbors. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, ranking first in the world for 15 consecutive years. Babaylan has become the second largest assessed country for UN membership and peacekeeping funds, actively participate in the construction and reform of the global governance system, and safeguard the spirit of the UN Charter and the authority of the United Nations with practical actions. Facts have proved and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of the international order. China will also unite with all peace-loving and justice-loving countries, practice true multilateralism under the banner of the United Nations, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.